Cultural Heritage

A UKOLN Blog for the Cultural Heritage sector (now archived)

Lost Online Heritage

Posted by Brian Kelly on March 8th, 2010

In the news recently is the warning from a group of leading libraries in the UK that we are heading for a “digital black hole”. This is because the current wording of the Legal Deposit Libraries Act means that archiving Web sites can only be done with the owners persmission, so major libraries such as the British Library face a big overhead on their archiving programme in terms of time taken to identify, locate and contact the owners. British Library chief executive Dame Lynn Brindley estimates that this restriction means that just 1% of free UK Web sites will be archived by 2011.

As the BBC news item notes, ephemera is a useful source of information to social historians on many levels. It’s not just the content (e.g. political party pamphlets, concert programmes, flyers about anything and everything) but also the look and feel of these items – each era has its own distinctive look in graphic design. The same goes for Web sites – if you are able to look at older Web sites that haven’t had a recent makeover you’ll see the difference. And that is the nub of the problem – the sites that have disappeared entirely or whose content has changed dramatically over time.

This got me wondering about how many library, museum and archive Web sites self-archive? What happens to all the old content when a project finishes or you have a major redesign or contract out the Web site provision to an external service?

So what do you do? A good first step is to read about the issues and some of the practical steps you can take. The UKOLN CUltural Heritage team have produced a series of briefing documents on digital preservation. These include Mothballing Your Web Site, Preserving Your Homepage, Top Ten Tips for Web Site Preservation and most importantly Developing Your Digital Preservation Policy.

Posted in Preservation | Comments Off

Follow ukolnculture on Twitter

Posted by Brian Kelly on March 1st, 2010

I’ve been working on the Cultural Heritage part of the UKOLN Web site for the last couple of years and as part of this I’ve started using some Web 2.0 tools and services – LibraryThing for the Bookshelf, Dipity for demonstrating the uses of blogs, Delicious for the Ariadne Digest, writing for this blog – and now I’ve created an account (ukolnculture) on twitter.

So why did I do this? You’re reading this blog, so I assume you discovered it somehow. Maybe you saw the link on the UKOLN home page or the link in the Cultural Heritage pages? Perhaps someone passed on the URL to you or you heard about it at one of our Web 2.0 events? The thing is that there are lots of ways you could find out about the blog and we don’t know which way it will happen. So we can’t rely on people finding us via route A – we have to make sure you can find us via routes B and C (and may be on as far as route Z) as well.

Why twitter? Well, for three reasons. We know that some people from cultural heritage organisations – our target audience – are already on twitter. We also like to use the Cultural Heritage pages to demomstrate how you could use a service for your organisation. And thirdly, if we are going to suggest you use it, we need to have used it ourselves.

So how did I fare as a newbie twitterer? Sign up is easy – just fill in Full Name, Username, Password and email address. But hold on – it’s worth thinking about this just a little beforehand. Full Name doesn’t have to be your personal name; so if you are creating an account for the museum friends or the library reading groups, then use something like Someplace Museum Friends or Someplace Library Readers (though there’s a little catch here in that you’ve only got 20 characters available so you might need to be a little creative). What about Username? Well this is the bit that twitter followers will see – in our case ukolnculture. As this gets quoted in tweets it’s good to keep this short but do think about how it reads – we decided against ukolnculther. And finally the email address – twitter will use this to contact you to confirm the set up of the account. This doesn’t have to be your personal one (you may be reponsible for the twitter account this year but it could be someone else next year) so you could use a corporate one.

Having got the account – what next? That really depends on what you want to use twitter for. Could be you want to promote events in your library or museum, or a way to let people know of unexpected closures (the recent snow springs to mind). For some things, you might need to write the posts yourself. Not difficult, simply sign in to the account and start typing the message – in 140 characters. You don’t even have to do the counting – twitter shows the character count just above the text box and the number drops as you type, delete text and the count rises. It’s useful to post an initial tweet that simply say something about the pupose of the account, such as ‘Created the someplacemuseum Twitter account for news about our events and exhibitions’.

But there is an alternative and that is using another service to pull text from RSS feeds into your twitter account, which is what we are doing. Maybe you already have a news page or a library blog with an RSS feed set up. Sign up to twitterfeed and put in the URLs of the feeds you want to use and use the twitter link. If you are doing this it’s worth manually adding a second initial tweet saying something along the lines of ‘Created the ukolnculture Twitter account. This will publish various work-related RSS feeds’. But what about that 140 character limit? All that happens is that the RSS feed is automatically truncated by twitter, so typically a tweet will be the title of a blog post and part of the first sentence – just enough to intrigue people enough to go to the blog and read the full post. It follows from this that long titles in blog posts should be avoided.

So what will you find if you follow ukolnculture on twitter? Our policy for this twitter account is to focus on letting people know about our activities for the cultural heritage sector. The tweets will come from three RSS feeds (though we may add further feeds at a later date). The Cultural Heritage blog feed will alert people to new posts on the blog. The events feed will inform people of news about our workshops and other events for the cultural heritage sector. The briefing documents feed will let people know when new Introbytes briefing documents are published.

If you are on twitter why not follow ukolnculture. If you’re not on twitter yet, why not have a think about what it could do for you? And usefully, it’s free.

Posted in Web 2.0 | Comments Off

Elsewhere on UKOLN Blogs: February 2010

Posted by Brian Kelly on February 26th, 2010

This month’s regular summary of posts on other UKOLN blogs which may be of interest to the cultural heritage community is given below.

SCONUL Access
If you are a researcher who works away from their organisation then SCONUL Access enables staff, students, and research students to borrow material from other libraries. Find out more
Published 25 February 2010
Home working and the Rebound Effect
What is the rebound effect and what is does it have to do with home working and events organisation?
Published 16 February 2010
Moderated Comments? Closed Comments? No Thanks!
How moderation of blog comments can act as a barrier to engagement with readers of a blog.
Published 15 February 2010
Remote Audiences
What is transliteracy and what role do remote audiences play? A guest blog post by Kirsty McGill.
Published 12 February 2010
A Challenge To Linked Data Developers
Can Linked Web developers use DBpedia to answer a query?
Published 12 February 2010
OMG! Is That Me On The Screen?
How should you go about reusing photographs of people in presentations?
Published 10 February 2010
Higher Ambitions, e-learning and remote working
What does the government’s Higher Ambitions paper say about remote and online learning. More on the task force led by Lynne Brindley, Chief Executive of the British Library.
Published 8 February 2010
H.264 Format Free To End Users Until (At Least) 2016
Will the extension of the licence for use of the H.264 format see this proprietary but well-supported video format become widely deployed on the Web?
Published 4 February 2010
Guide to Mobile Broadband Providers
A look at the mobile broadband providers available from Joe Linford of Broadband Genie
Published 4 February 2010
iPad, Flash, HTML 5 and Standards
Will HTML 5 see the introduction of open video formats for the Web?
Published 3 February 2010
Decommissioning / Mothballing Mailing Lists
What policies should you adopt if you discover the existence of unused JISCMail mailing lists?
Published 1 February 2010

Posted in Blogs | Comments Off

Policies on Moderation of Blog Comments

Posted by Brian Kelly on February 22nd, 2010

Readers of posts on this blog are free to submit comments.  Comments are published automatically, with no manual approval process required. The decision to permit comments to be published without needing to check the contents was taken in order to minimise barriers for readers wishing to engage in discussions on the blog.

Dangers with this approach includes risks that automated comment spam messages are published or that inappropriate comments are submitted.

The risk that automated spam posts will be published is minimised by the Akismet spam filter which has proved successful in trapping a large number of spam comments.  The automated tool has also helped to minimise the effort needed by the blog administrators in checking submitted comments and choosing whether to delete inappropriate comment or publish legitimate comments.

The risk that inappropriate comments may be submitted has, in reality, not happened to any significant extent, with  the occasional spam comment which Akismet fails to detect being spotted and deleted normally in a few hours after publication. We also are aware that readers of this blog are capable of spotting spam comments for themselves, so we do not feel there is a risk to our reputation if this happens.

However although our policy on unmoderated comments is appropriate for this blog, this may not be the case for all blogs.  If you blog service does not have an automated comment spam filter, then moderation may be needed in order to avoid your blog becoming filled with spam comments, thereby probably inhibiting legitimate readers from submitting their own comments.

If you run a very popular blog, or your blog covers newsworthy topics (e.g. global warming) you could possibly find that management of blog comments becomes time-consuming.

In order to assist blog owners in formulating their policies i n this area  a UKOLN briefing document on Policies On Blog Comments has been published, based on feedback received on a recent UK Web Focus blog post.

We hope this document is useful for those of you who are involving in providing blog services to your user communities.

Posted in Blogs | Comments Off

100 And Counting

Posted by Brian Kelly on February 18th, 2010

We have now published 100 posts on UKOLN’s Cultural Heritage blog since it was launched in January 2009.  The aim of the blog was to enable UKOLN’s Cultural Heritage support team (myself, Marieke Guy and Ann Chapman) to have a mechanism for speedy publication of resources relevant to the cultural heritage sector.  The blog also provides the team with a valuable opportunity to gain experiences of various issues related to providing and sustaining a blog service,  which will inform our various workshops and briefing documents.

For those who may be new to the blog a summary of the approaches taken and highlights of  the various posts is given below.

Guest Blog Posts
We publish guest blog posts from practitioners in the cultural heritage sector.  These include a post on The Black Art of Blogging (which reported on the impact of a UKOLN workshop on blogging), a summary of Brighton Museum & Art Gallery’s The ‘On the Pull’ Project (which featured as a case study at one of the UKOLN’s Social Web workshops), another case study presented at a UKOLN workshop entitled When Peregrines Come To Town, a post  by Nick Poole, Chief Executive of the Collections Trust (which described Collections Trust’s Digital Programmes on the OpenCulture Blog), a post by Margaret Adolphus, a journalist specialising in librarianship, the knowledge industry on Dull Library Web Sites and, most recently a post by Nicola McNee on Communicating with the Facebook generation.
Blog Posts Related To Peer-Reviewed Papers
Blog posts by UKOLN staff have provided access to papers and accompanying slides for peer-reviewed papers including papers on  Empowering Users and Institutions: A Risks and Opportunities Framework for Exploiting the Social Web (presented at the Cultural Heritage Online 2009 Conference) and a post on Clouds, Libraries and Museums (which described a workshop session based on a paper entitled “Software as a Service and Open APIs” written by Paul Walk).
Blog Posts on UKOLN Presentations
Blog posts have also provided an opportunity to report on talks given at a range of events throughout the country including the AIM 2009 conference, the CILIP-S and CILIP Wales conferences, the “Archives 2.0: Shifting Dialogues between Users and Archivists” conference, the MCG Spring Meeting and the Silos of the LAMS CILIP Executive briefing.
Blog Posts on Addressing Institutional Barriers
A recurring theme at the Social Web workshops we deliver are the institutional barriers to the exploitation of Social Web services in libraries, museums and archives. A number of the posts we have published have looked ways of addressing such barriers. In order to provide ease-of-access to the such posts we have created an addressing barriers category which groups these posts together.
Links To Other UKOLN Blogs
We have provided a monthly summary of posts published on other UKOLN blogs which may be of interest to the cultural heritage sector. For example, see the summaries for January 2010, December 2009 and November 2009.
Multimedia Posts
A number of the blog posts contains embedded multimedia resources, such as slides or videos, typically taken during presentations by UK staff. We hope that this use of multimedia and the provision of access to the resources used at our presentations will help to enhance the impact of the ideas given in the presentations.

We hope our readers have found the 100 blog posts of interest and value. If you have any comments on the blog or ideas for future posts we would welcome them.

Posted in Blogs | Comments Off

Council Gritter Twitters Leading The Way?

Posted by Brian Kelly on February 16th, 2010

A recently published SOCITM Report “shows how Councils are starting to use global social networks like Facebook and Twitter as well as hyperlocal, community websites operating in their areas, to communicate with their residents and businesses when local emergencies arise“.

The 16 page report is free for SOCITM members (and costs £25 for non-subscribers). An accompanying summary of the report entitled “Twitter gritters: council use of digital channels in local emergencies” described how a recent structured survey of 125 councils across the UK “looked at how councils were publishing information about service disruptions during the period of snow and ice.  It looked at their use of Twitter and Facebook to communicate with the public and analysed the data from the Website take-up service to see how traffic to their websites was affected“. It seems that “in January 2010, traffic to council websites rose sharply, with further analysis suggesting that 75% of the increase in January’s traffic related to the impact of the severe weather“.

This report on how councils exploited Social Web services during the recent bad weather contrasts with another recent SOCITM survey on council’s attitudes to providing access to Social Web services. As described in an article published by PublicTechnology.net the Socitm report fires a social media warning shot to the public sector. The article described how “around 90% of respondents revealed some level of restrictions were in place to prevent employees to access social media in the workplace, with 67% confirming a total ban on its use“.

Such inconsistencies might not be unexpected. It does seem to me, however, that library and museum staff who are frustrated at not being able to engage with their user communities through use of Social Web technologies may be able to use the Gritter Twitter story to persuade local authorities to liberalise their access policies.

Posted in Addressing Barriers, Social Web | 1 Comment »

CILIP Update publication changes

Posted by Brian Kelly on February 15th, 2010

As a member of the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP) I’ve received print copies of its journal Update for many years. Originally monthly and more recently with ten issues a year, from January 2008 selected articles were available in a digital version. Now I learn that from 2010 six editions a year will be in printed in hard-copy and six in digital format.

What difference will it make to me? The digital issues have new features (a choice of three reading views, a slideshow of the magazine, increased coverage through web links to additional content, and access to the magazine 24/7 anywhere in the world), members can access the archive of previous digital issues and further developments, including embedded audio and video content, are being researched. While that all sounds great (and I know that print publishing and mailing out is expensive) I then realised that there are some downsides too.

The journal is a member benefit, so access to Update Digital (and its archive) is restricted to CILIP members. Now I have access to the Internet at work and at home; other members may have neither. Further, I regularly lend my copies to a non-librarian colleague to read – and I can’t do the same for him with Update Digital issues. And if I have an article published in Update, I can’t simply link to it from my own publications web page.

So is it wrong to keep professional journals behind bars? When CILIP Cataloguing and Indexing Group (CIG) decided to move ‘Catalogue and Index’ from a print journal to an e-journal we also struggled with this issue, with some people arguing strongly for totally free access. In the end we came to a pragmatic compromise. It’s a benefit for CIG members, so we have members only access via the CILIP web site. But this only applies to the issues of the current year; the archive of digital issues from previous years is totally free for anyone to view and we also have plans to digitise the back run. Another downside of restricted access also means that we can’t have articles linked elsewhere or let authors link from their own web pages until the following year. And for those people without Internet access? We sent out a print letter to our members before the move to digital asking anyone who still needed a print copy to contact us – only a handful of people requested this, so currently these are printed off and sent out. Institutional subscribers get a PDF file and permission to print a hard copy for their members. Our solution is not perfect and we are keeping it under review, but for the moment it works.

Posted in Cataloguing, Libraries | Comments Off

The 90% Who Can and the 90% Who Can’t

Posted by Brian Kelly on February 11th, 2010

A recent post on the UK Web Focus blog described the recently-published report on an Investigation into Challenges, Application and Benefits of Social Media in UK HEIs. The report, which was based on a survey open to the UK Higher Education community, described how:

There are few restrictions on access to social Web services in the community, with unrestricted access to Facebook, Twitter, Blogging, MySpace, YouTube and Flickr reported by 90% of the institutions.

This figure contrasts sharply with the “90% of councils restrict social media” according to a recently published SOCITM survey of use of the Web across local authorities and reported in an article in Computer Weekly. The article goes on to describe how:

Around 90% of councils restrict access in some way, and Socitm is urging IT bosses to encourage their organisations to open up to its opportunities instead of being cautious.

About 67% completely ban the use of networks such as Facebook and Twitter, in contrast to most private sector organisations which do not block access.

Within the Higher Education community there have been a number of high profile reports which have identified the value of Web 2.0 and the Social Web to support the main aims of higher educational institutions. These reports include:

The JISC SIS Landscape Study on “A survey of the use of Web 2.0 tools and services in the UK HE sector” (33 page PDF document), published in January 2010 and summarised in a recent UK Web Focus blog post.

The “Higher Education in a Web 2.0 World” report (52 page PDF document) which was published by Committee of Inquiry into the Changing Learner Experience (CLEX) in May 2009 and summarised in a UK Web Focus blog post.”

The “Edgeless University: Why Higher Education Must Embrace Technology” report, which was commissioned by Demos which was published on 23 June 2009 and summarised in a UK Web Focus blog post.

The frustrations felt by practitioners in museums, libraries and archives is a recurring feature of UKOLN’s Introduction to Web 2.0 and the Social Web workshops which we have been delivering across the country over the peat couple of years. Such concerns are becoming more worrying as the general election approaches.  A recent tweet from MLA on how “Libraries could shut in wave of spending cuts, under Government plans” alerted me to an article published in the Daily Telegraph on how “Libraries could shut in wave of spending cuts, under Government plans“. The byline  read “Public libraries across the country could be closed to save money, under plans being considered by ministers” – and yes, it seems that Conservative shadow ministers are up in arms over plans by the Labour Government to shut down public libraries! It a strange world we are currently living in.

What role can the Social Web play in this environment?  It seems to me that practitioners in the outwards-facing departments, such as museums, libraries and archives, should be encouraged to make use of the Social Web  to support their key activities.  And use of such services can help to address the economic difficulties by avoiding unnecessary duplication of IT services in-house – a point made by SOCITM in a press release which described how:

… social media might be able to help address looming budget cuts by providing a cheap way to talk to citizens and provide services. Social media can also give employers new ways of empowering and supporting employers.

Isn’t it time that local authorities were penalised if they failed to exploit the opportunities which the Social Web is providing? And remember the concerns which have been expressed (including technical concerns such as security, reliability, interoperability and human issues such as “it’s a waste of time!”) are equally relevant to the higher education sector – where such concerns are being addressed.

Posted in Addressing Barriers, Social Web | Comments Off

What’s all the Fuss About Buzz?

Posted by Marieke Guy on February 10th, 2010

It feels like we’ve only just start to master one new and important Google technology (Google Wave) and they are already throwing a new one at us.

Earlier this week Google announced a new service called Google Buzz. At first look Google Buzz seems very similar to Twitter, Friendfeed or Facebook in that it involves posting status messages. The idea is that it adds a social networking angle to Google Mail (Gmail) and the rest of the Google suite, and it uses your current contacts list.

Lifehaker explains that Buzz’s five key features are:

  • Automatic friends lists (friends are added automatically who you have emailed on Gmail)
  • “Rich fast sharing” combines sources like Picasa and Twitter into a single feed, and it includes full-sized photo browsing
  • Public and private sharing (swap between family and friends)
  • Inbox integration (instead of emailing you with updates, like Facebook might, Buzz features emails that update dynamically with all Buzz thread content)
  • “Recommended Buzz” puts friend-of-friend content into your stream, even if you’re not acquainted. Recommendations learn over time with your feedback.

Buzz can pull content from a variety of other sources including Twitter, Picasa Web (Google’s image manangement service), YouTube, Blogger and any other RSS feed you have connected to your Google profile. Google have also got their Buzz mobile applications at the ready and have integrated it into the Google.com mobile homepage. They will also be using location information to know let people know where someone is when they post. Google have stated that they are also doing their best to make Buzz as open as possible by providing an open API that respects a users privacy decisions.

So what are the big concerns?

Many of us now use Twitter and Facebook as part of our working routine so could Buzz be the next big thing? What are the issues and concerns for those of us working in the cultural heritage sector?

Firewalls
One big concern is that by making Gmail moonlight as a social networking tool some employers may want to ban its use. This is a real issue for those working in the Cultural Heritage sector where council bans on social networking tools are aplenty.
Spam
As a working tool many people don’t like the ‘added extras’ sites like Facebook bring (in the form of custard pies to throw and games to play!), it looks like Buzz will avoid much of this baggage. It will be important that there is an option to turn Buzz off and filter content in some way.
Inclusion
Buzz is social networking tool for those who use Gmail. Those who don’t use Gmail are unlikely to switch or may merely use it a place to repost items already appearing elsewhere. Has the social networking market reached saturation point?
Sharing
The openness of Buzz is a positive. There may be many ways feeds can be integrated and mashed up with other applications in the future. The use of location information is an interesting case and may have many implications.

Have you tried Google Buzz? What do you think? Let us know.

Further resources

Posted in Web 2.0 | 3 Comments »

FRBR lecture at BL

Posted by Brian Kelly on February 8th, 2010

I had the chance recently to attend a lecture at the British Library on FRBR given by Ronald J. Murray of the Library of Congress. If you are not a cataloguer, you may not recognise the acronym. FRBR stands for Functional Requirements of Bibliographic Records, a theoretical model that describes what we want catalogue records to do and (briefly) the data they need to contain to achieve that.

Why is this important to anybody other than cataloguers? Well, FRBR changed the way we think about the data in catalogue records because it made us think about the users of catalogues. FRBR concepts then became embedded in the new cataloguing rules Resource Description and Access (RDA), which in turn has prompted changes to the MARC Format (a metadata schema for library catalogue data). The changes in the format will now enable library management system vendors to develop new products which offer a richer searching experience to users.

So how might this work in practice? Typing in ‘cats’ as a search term in my public library catalogue today brings up 500 results. There is no order to the list, it includes both fiction and non-fiction titles and it doesn’t separate out different forms of resource. I could limit the search to items in my local branch (213 results) or limit it by media – large print, say, which gets me just 7 results – but however I limit I am still faced with an unordered list of adult and junior fiction and non-fiction titles in various media.

Now, if the catalogue had been designed with FRBR principles and a MARC Format enabled for RDA defined data, then my experience would be different. For example, options to limit my search for content type and audience would make it easier to find a book written for adults. Adding in a further limiter for media type means I could restrict the search to large print titles or e-books. Even if I don’t limit in these ways, if the right data is in the record (and the system is designed to do this) the results display could show the items in different groups – all the adult non-fiction text resources first, then junior non-fiction, then junior fiction, then videos, say. Another way would be to start with cats as a search term; the first results display might simply say ’500 items found’ and ask you to choose limiters (e.g. adult/junior, fiction/non-fiction, text/video/images).

Even if I am much more specific in my search term at the beginning, e.g. Romeo and Juliet, I get 102 results if I put no limits on it. The first page of results gives an animated version on DVD, a film on DVD, a ‘fantasy overture’ recorded music performance on CD, a playset with multiple copies, a vocal score for an opera, hardback text, a talking book on CD, a paperback text, a hardback text about the play, and another recorded music performance of the fantasy overture on audio cassette. If I knew I wanted the music recording, I could have limited it as ‘music’ but if I wanted a recording of the ballet and not the opera I can only limit by DVD. The results displays at this point mean I can easily see if something is on videotape or DVD, but recordings of the ballet and the opera are mixed up with films of the play and animated versions. In a FRBRised catalogue, a search for Romeo and Juliet, content = ballet, media = DVD, would find me the one item in stock.

So FRBR might be more important than you think in delivering a better library catalogue experience to your users in the future.

Posted in Cataloguing, Libraries | 1 Comment »

Write A Guest Blog Post and Make an Impact!

Posted by Brian Kelly on February 2nd, 2010

Nicola McNee’s recent guest blog post on “What’s my email address anyway Miss?” Communicating with the Facebook generation” generated a fair amount of traffic on Twitter last week as can be seen by analysing the statistics for the bit.ly short URL for the post: http://bit.ly/dh5BKQ+ .

The 26 tweets which included the URL seem to have resulted in 126 clicks to the post within a period of about 24 hours.   A list of those tweets is given at the bottom of this post to illustrate the viral aspect of Twitter and how it can be used to enhance access to the content of blogs (or other resources).

Nicola has been inited to republish the post in The School Librarian, the quarterly journal of the School Library Association.

We have published several guest blog posts previously including Catriona Cardle’s “The Black Art of Blogging” report on a UKOLN workshop on blogs; Nick Moyes description of “When Peregrines Come To Town“”; Nick Poole’s review of “Collections Trust’s Digital Programmes on the OpenCulture Blog“; Margaret Adolphus description of the problem with “Dull Library Web Sites“‘ and Dave Jenkins on “Google Wave and libraries: a snapshot“.

UKOLN’s Cultural Heritage blog provides a useful channel for those involved in the provision of online services in the cultural heritage sector to share their approaches across the community and gain greater expsoure to their work (we often use the examples provided in the guest blog posts in our workshops and our documentation). 

If you would be interested in making the most of an opportunity to share your experiences in this way, please get in touch. You can contact Brian Kelly, Ann Chapman or Marieke Guy


Summary of Twitter Posts On Recent Guest Blog Post

ACinIowa RT @ccaswell: Nice post from the UK on communicating with the “Facebook Generation” http://bit.ly/9UjoNO #edtech #education
ccaswell Nice post from the UK on communicating with the “Facebook Generation” http://bit.ly/9UjoNO #edtech #education
bectawatch RT @nextgenlearning: Interesting blog that familiarises school children with the social web http://tinyurl.com/yhu4qsn
ebookseditor RT @nextgenlearning: Interesting blog that familiarises school children with the social web http://tinyurl.com/yhu4qsn
HelenHRSC RT @nextgenlearning: Interesting blog that familiarises school children with the social web http://tinyurl.com/yhu4qsn
CathRiordan RT @nextgenlearning Interesting blog that familiarises school children with the social web http://tinyurl.com/yhu4qsn
SavvyCitizens RT @nextgenlearning: Interesting blog that familiarises school children with the social web http://tinyurl.com/yhu4qsn
nextgenlearning Interesting blog that familiarises school children with the social web http://tinyurl.com/yhu4qsn
LISResearch “Communicating with the Facebook generation”. Interesting observations/strategies by school librarian @nicolamcnee http://bit.ly/daM0d9
NicolaMcNee Thanks for all RT’s about blog post on social media in school http://bit.ly/dfFZnR. It was a great opp to reflect on what I do and why.
MaryAnnHarlan RT @buffyjhamilton: Excellent guest post on from school librarian @nicolamcnee on social media use in schools http://bit.ly/dzlT07
SPAelemenschool Teaching using social media – Communicating with the Facebook generation – “appropriate to the student’s education”? http://ow.ly/114iU
bethanar agreed! RT@joeyanne Excellent guest post UKOLN blog from school librarian @nicolamcnee on social media use in schools http://bit.ly/dzlT07
bibliothekarin RT @joeyanne: Excellent guest post on UKOLN Cultural Heritage blog @nicolamcnee on social media use in schools http://bit.ly/dzlT07
buffyjhamilton RT @joeyanne: Excellent guest post on from school librarian @nicolamcnee on social media use in schools http://bit.ly/dzlT07
joeyanne Excellent guest post on UKOLN Cultural Heritage blog from school librarian @nicolamcnee on social media use in schools http://bit.ly/dzlT07
quelet RT @briankelly: Guest blog post from @nicolamcnee published on use of Web 2.0 in schools: http://bit.ly/dh5BKQ
miquelduran RT @briankelly: Guest blog post from @nicolamcnee published on use of Web 2.0 in schools: http://bit.ly/dh5BKQ
fleming77 RT @research_inform: What’s my email address anyway Miss?” Communicating with the Facebook generation http://tiny.cc/RHWMB
calire RT @briankelly: Guest blog post from @nicolamcnee published on use of Web 2.0 in schools: http://bit.ly/dh5BKQ Interesting reading.
timbuckteeth RT @briankelly: Guest blog post from @nicolamcnee published on use of Web 2.0 in schools: http://bit.ly/dh5BKQ
pinstripetwit Cultural Heritage » Blog Archive » Guest Post: “What’s my email …: Can BECTA’s differentiation between “social n… http://bit.ly/ddFI2Q
research_inform What’s my email address anyway Miss?” Communicating with the Facebook generation http://tiny.cc/RHWMB
briankelly Guest blog post from @nicolamcnee published on use of Web 2.0 in schools: http://bit.ly/dh5BKQ
FreePsyche Free Reading !!! Cultural Heritage » Blog Archive » Guest Post: “What’s my email …: It comes… http://bit.ly/ddFI2Q mypsychicsonline.inf
AidanBaker RT @briankelly: Guest blog post from @nicolamcnee published on use of Web 2.0 in schools: http://bit.ly/dh5BKQ
mariekeguy RT @briankelly: Guest blog post from @nicolamcnee published on use of Web 2.0 in schools: http://bit.ly/dh5BKQ
 
 

Posted in Web 2.0 | Comments Off

Elsewhere on UKOLN Blogs: January 2010

Posted by Brian Kelly on January 29th, 2010

This month’s regular summary of posts on other UKOLN blogs which may be of interest to the cultural heritage community is given below.

Begin with the End in Mind
Some suggestions on how to write for different audiences.
Published 27 January 2010
The big fight: Mobile vs PC
Can the mobile Web ever be better than the PC Web or are they just different?
Published 25 January 2010
STRIDE E-Learning Handbook
The STRIDE E-learning handbook is available as a free PDF download.
Published 25 January 2010
My Significant Drop in Use of JISCMail Lists
In some sectors JISCMail may no longer be a significant tool for collaboration and information exchange.
Published 22 January 2010
Save £1million and Move to the Cloud?
We are starting to see a move to use of core services to hosting in ‘the Cloud’. Can this save money?
Published 20 January 2010
Twitter: Part of the Plumbing
Twitter is now becoming a key part of an institution’s information’s infrastructure. So you’ll need policies and procedures.
Published 19 January 2010
Time For A Blog Revival?
For from being in decline, blogs can provide a valuable dissemination and engagement tool – and UKOLN’s briefing documents can be a valuable resource.
Published 16 January 2010
Reflections on CETIS’s “Future of Interoperability Standards” Meeting
A report on a meeting which explored the limitations of elearning standards.
Published 14 January 2010
Retro email list takes new direction
The Retro JISCMail list  has been revived and is now focusing on the need for a national strategy for retro-cataloguing.
Published 12 January 2010
How I Use Creative Commons For My Presentations
A case study on a risk management approach to use of Creative Commons.
Published 13 January 2010
Will The SVG Standard Come Back to Life?
Open standards sometimes may take a long time before they become support by software vendors.
Published 11 January 2010
Greening Events
Possible ways that we can start to reduce the environmental impact of the events we run.
Published 11 January 2010
Let It Snow, Let It Snow, Let It Snow
A summary of how institutions are beginning to make use of Twitter to provide alerts.
Published 7 January 2010
An Opportunities and Risks Framework For Standards
Open standards promise much – but sometimes they may fail to live up to their promise. This post describes an opportunities and risks framework  to assist in the selection of standards.
Published 6 January 2010
My Decade
Marieke Guy gives her thoughts on some of the significant IT developments of the decade.
Published 4 January 2010

Posted in Blogs | Comments Off

Guest Post: “What’s my email address anyway Miss?” Communicating with the Facebook generation

Posted by guestblogger on January 27th, 2010

About This Guest Post

In this guest blog post Nicola McNee, Librarian at Kingswood School, near Bath explores the challenges in familiarising school children with the potential of the Social Web.


“What’s my email address anyway Miss?”:
Communicating with the Facebook generation

Nicola and her students

Nicola McNee and her students

Email is the “snail” mail of the current generation of teenagers. Shocking, but true. It comes as a bit of a surprise to those of us who have spent the last 15 or so years enduring the tedious routines of logging in, reading, replying, deleting and attaching. But why would you do all that when you can tell all your friends what’s happening in your life through one status update on Facebook and make arrangements for meeting them through Instant Messaging here and now in real time. And, oh, if you want to submit that vital bit of homework-well there’s the handing in point on the schools Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) for just that purpose isn’t there?

“Undeliverable. Recipients mailbox is full”

The challenge then, for all educators whether in museum, library or school is how we communicate with these teenagers when our mailings get returned with “Undeliverable. Recipients mailbox is full” from their institutional email addresses. More importantly how do we integrate teen’s social media activities online into how we teach and learn in school? Both encompass learning in a social environment so it should be easy shouldn’t it?

Trying to find a way forward in the Independent School where I work, as a librarian, is daunting but also extremely exciting. Kingswood Senior School has 650 students aged 11-18 and about a third of them live on site in a beautiful location on the outskirts of Bath. The school was founded by John Wesley and has a Christian ethos with an emphasis on educating the whole person in a community environment. This includes a wide ranging programme of extra-curricular activities as well as excellent teaching of the traditional curriculum.

As the first professional librarian employed by the school I have had the privilege over the last 4 years of setting up a new library which has quickly been embraced by the students and staff alike. It’s not an exaggeration to say the facilities are busy all day everyday with formal research (during structured lesson time) and informal learning at lunchtimes and after school.

More recently I have been developing a programme for students to improve their research and study skills. Students at the age of 11 and 12 learn how to structure a research query and use the library and its resources to answer it, through a series of projects relating to the Personal, Social and Health curriculum. This is augmented by research tasks undertaken in other departments to encourage students to develop their independent learning skills further.

Teaching using social media for learning

So far so good. But I have become increasingly aware of the many interactive tools on the social web that could be used to develop students’ study skills. It is my belief that we are not doing our job properly in school if we aren’t helping and positively encouraging our students to find them. To this end I have, since September, been teaching a 6 week module to Year 11’s about to sit their GCSE examinations about using social media for learning. This contains the opportunity to sign up for a personalised web page – using iGoogle, share brainstorming with Bubbl.us and discover electronic note taking with Evernote (illustrated below).

Evernote

The RSS reader on iGoogle is used to explain the concept that the information they want can be brought to their desktop and continually updated. Examples are taken from current work like mindmapping an essay plan for the English text “An Inspector Calls” or storing notes about Pacifism for GCSE Religious Studies “Issues”.

Students have, on the whole, seen the point of the course immediately. I have called it “Organizing Your Online Life” and tried to show them how they can join up their way of socializing online and studying at school. A survey of the first two groups (through Surveymonkey naturally) has revealed that 41% found the course life changing and a further 27% enjoyable. Two thirds of the students said they would definitely be continuing to use at least one of the tools on a regular basis.

Undeliverable. The school’s curriculum is full?

But it hasn’t been easy and there are difficulties I continue to face in teaching a course like this. Sometimes it has genuinely felt like “Undeliverable. The School’s curriculum is full!” There are problems with the perception by some staff that social media activity is wasting time. Choices of which tools to introduce are limited by safeguards deemed necessary for the network to protect students from bullying or worse. And school policy (in keeping with DCSF guidelines) discourages staff from “befriending” students in an online social environment.

Is it “appropriate to the student’s education”?

After proudly explaining how one sports mad teenager had set up a page full of RSS feeds from the likes of the Arsenal web site (whilst demonstrating iGoogle to a group of teaching colleagues) I was challenged as to whether this was “educational”. The schools acceptable use policy states that “all internet activity should be appropriate to the student’s education” and that word appropriate is obviously open to interpretation. Just what is appropriate? Just what is educational? As far as I am concerned learning to manipulate RSS feeds is definitely an appropriate life skill for a 15 year old to learn. Maybe I’m wrong? My reply was also to ask why this activity was any different from coming to the library and reading the sports supplement in the Times newspaper? Or sitting on a beanbag and reading a fantasy novel at lunchtime? The positive outcome to all this discussion has resulted in a helpful review of the wording of our acceptable use policy.

The current policy means that all social networking sites like Facebook, Youtube or Twitter are automatically filtered on the schools network even for Sixth form students although the boarding students, whose parents agree, are allowed access to some social networking at weekends. The reasoning behind this is that students are in our care and have to be protected and anyway if they could visit these sites they would waste too much time using them. However, the attitude towards this blanket ban during the school day is changing. Recently the school undertook a series of assemblies showing students the potential problems they could face if they didn’t protect themselves online. Everyone was then given access to Facebook at lunchtime to allow them to adjust their privacy settings. But I personally do not think this is enough. Surely it’s our duty to teach them to be “savvy” online in a more intensive structured way and even more to acknowledge how networking can be utilized to improve their learning. This is especially important when GSCE students have told me that one of the most helpful strategies for revising for exams is by “testing” each other i.e. working together socially! Just think… they can do that when they are home alone in the evenings (across the Internet) if we show them how.

“This application has terminated in an unusual way”

There are problems too with using social media on the Internet as part of a schools network. Our School IT department has been very helpful in unblocking access to sites like Bubbl.us so that I can deliver my course of taster sessions. But the nature of our network environment means that students can’t always do the things they can on a personal computer at home. It’s great they can access their own personal network space from any computer in school but this means they cannot set their customized iGoogle page as their homepage. As well as this applications will not recognize their logins from previous visits so students have to remember all their log-in formats and passwords to the social media they use. Not any easy feat for some (myself included).

Voicethread created by a Year 7 class

Voicethread created by a Year 7 class (click for full size image)

Like many institutions we use the Internet Explorer browser and had been using IE6 for a number of years. Many new applications like Wallwisher, Glogster and Voicethread (which is illustrated ) require IE 7 and we had to upgrade across the network before they could be used with the junior classes I teach. But then IE 7 has its own problems with add-on toolbars used in applications like the very useful Diigo social bookmarking tool. I would love to share this with students because they could share bookmarks with one another and highlight text online. Unfortunately my own use of Diigo often results in the message “This application has terminated in an unusual way” and a shut down of the Internet browser so it has proved impossible to demonstrate it in lessons.

“With regard to social networking outside of school”

In our staff Internet access policy we are “strongly advised” not to befriend students outside of school “lest allegations, founded or unfounded-are made”. I haven’t really had a problem with this because the social networking sites I show have a recognizable educational use and I never encourage students to befriend me on them. I discuss the issue with the students and explain the school policy. I have recently found myself followed on Twitter by some of my GCSE students but I have sent them each a message thanking them for following me and in a humorous way reminding them that I won’t be following back. I expect they’ll get bored with my tweets quite quickly! However if I was a subject teacher it would be very useful for me to collaborate on, say Google docs, with presentations with my students. Does this cross the boundaries? Can BECTA’s differentiation between “social networks” and “online communities” be sustained? I note that Microsoft Office 2010 has a number of ways of linking with open source networking sites so this will become an issue that needs to be clarified further.

Developing social learning in the future

The biggest problem I see for the future is ensuring that staff have information about social media sites and the confidence to integrate the use of them into their teaching and learning. Fortunately this has been recognized by the school’s Senior Management Team and the current Head of Academic ICT has the vision to want to transform her role into one of Coordinator of E-learning. She wants ICT to be taught not as a disparate subject but across the curriculum with a strong emphasis on learning collaboratively. This is really good news for me as we have already worked together on cross-curricular approaches to improving independent study skills. But, from my experience, unless we ensure a parallel programme of support and confidence-building for staff the gap between how students learn at home and in school will grow ever wider.

BECTA’s “Next Generation Learning” initiative states that:

Online communities offer children varied opportunities for developing knowledge and interests as well as important social and communication skills

Let’s hope that schools and teaching staff can exploit student interest in social networking to raise standards in learning!


About The Author

Nicola McNee has been Librarian at Kingswood School for the past 4 years. She has a wide range of previous experience working in academic and public libraries, mostly in Northern Ireland.

Nicola McNee can be contacted at njm@kingswood.bath.sch.uk or nicolamcnee@googlemail.com. Her Twitter id is @nicolamcnee and her Learning Log is available at <http://nicolamcnee.edublogs.org/>.

Posted in Addressing Barriers, Guest-blog, Social Web | 5 Comments »

Empower, Inform, Enrich – the DCMS Report

Posted by Brian Kelly on January 26th, 2010

Last week Liz Lyon (Director of UKOLN) and I spent some time working on UKOLN’s response to the DCMS report Empower, Inform, Enrich.

We welcomed the fact that many of the think pieces and case studies acknowledged the importance of the digital environment within public library services. However, the brevity of each individual contribution meant that there was an over-simplification of both impact and issues and there were gaps. The People’s Network is rightly praised for its success but now needs new goals, strategic direction and technical infrastructure. References to successful reading initiatives did not include Stories from the Web which combines library-based meetings and access to a virtual environment. What about the gaps? No mention of digital citizens nor of an increasing use of the mobile Web. No mention of community participation in building local resources and services nor of innovative ideas such as Citizen Science Hubs. [See Serving Digital Citizens, Liz Lyon's presentation to the LGA/MLA Conference, London, Dec. 2009.] Finally, we drew attention to the need to learn lessons from the past. A national, publicly searchable database is a worthwhile ambition but there are technical and logistical issues that will need to be resolved. Moving RevealWeb from an institutional server to UnityUK without a public-view licence removed visually impaired people’s option to find resources themselves. EnrichUK, the NOF-digi Web site, has disappeared – what happened to all those digitised resources? Work is underway to find out but the lesson is to think about long-term preservation and curation at the start of digitisation projects.

It’s not unusual for UKOLN to be responding to consultation documents from either the academic and cultural heritage sectors and writing collaboratively with a wider group of people requires a particular functionality. What about Web 2.0? Google Docs is a free service that allows you to create and store documents – this might be a good choice if it’s a one-off collaboration. Using Google Docs also means you have a public space to ‘publish’ the finished document if you want to. Alternatively you might try using a wiki (institutional or a free service) – this might be useful if there is other supporting or background material you want to store as well. [See UKOLN Briefing Paper An Introduction to Wikis.] The wiki approach is also useful if the document is going to have lots of sections as the text can be split up to be worked on. This is useful if you want to assign different people to write different sections of the text. Whatever your approach, it’s good practice to have one person in charge.

Posted in Libraries, Web 2.0, wikis | 1 Comment »

Blog Metrics in the Cultural Heritage Sector

Posted by Brian Kelly on January 25th, 2010

The importance of metrics on use of Social Web services can be gauged from the popularity of Seb Chan’s workshops in this area. Such interest may be due to the legitimate requirements for the providers of such services to observe how the services are being used. But in addition pressure from civil servants who need to respond to a New Labour fixation with targets and metrics seems to be leading to a requirement for the provision of such statistics for monitoring purposes. So although the usefulness of such metrics may sometimes be questionable there is a need to recognise that in today’s financially troubled times, the funders and the policy makers call the shots!

As part of UKOLN’s series of workshops for the cultural heritage sector we have been asked to run sessions which cover use of blogs and related technologies as there is increased interest in this area. UKOLN has run a number of workshops in this area over the past couple of years, so we are well placed to use existing materials to support
these events. However we have previously not covered approaches to evaluating the success of blogs to any significant extend, beyond suggestions for surveys of the user community.

In order to address this gap we have started work on exploring approaches for gaining factual evidence which has some relationship with effectiveness of blog in fulfilling their purpose which can be used to satisfy the needs of external auditors.

Statistics such as the numbers of posts and comments and the total number. of pages may be some obvious statistics which should be east to obtain, without significant resource costs. Of course if an emphasis is placed on such statistics in isolation there may be the temptation to publish additional content simply to artificially boost the statistics. However such an approach may lead to users no longer wishing to read such posts so there may be an argument that such temptations would be self-correcting.

But perhaps a better may would be to make use of existing external services which monitor the blogosphere. So rather than spending (non-existent!) public sector funding in developing solutions in-house it may be preferable to make use of the existing infrastructure – and perhaps accept the limitations of such services.

Initial work investigated the tanking statistics provided by Technorati.  However it appears that this blog has not been registered in Technorati, which means that Technorati isn’t currently able to rank this blog. Such ranking is based, it would appear, on parameters such as the  numbers of links to blogs and the authority of the blogs containing such links.

Technorati ranking statisticsHowever my UK Web Focus blog was registered with Technorati shortly after it was launched in November 2006, as I described shortly after the launch. As can be seen from the accompanying screen image the blog has an authority of 552 (out of a maximum of 1,000). This appears to rank the blog as the 2,433th most highly ranked blog out of the 1,179,313 which Technorati seems to be aware of i.e. in the top 0.2% of all such blogs!  Further investigation reveals that the blog is ranked at number 98 of technology blogs and 497 of business blogs.

In addition to the UK Web Focus blog UKOLN’s JISC PoWR (Preservation of Web Resources) blog is listed with an authority of 91, placing it in 88,839th place (i.e. in the top 10%).

Reading the Technorati Authority FAQ I find that:

  • Authority is calculated based on a site’s linking behavior, categorization and other associated data over a short, finite period of time. A site’s authority may rapidly rise and fall depending on what the blogosphere is discussing at the moment, and how often a site produces content being referenced by other sites.
  • The new Authority calculation differs from the past version, which measured linking behavior over a longer 6 month timeframe. Please note that links in blogrolls don’t count towards Authority, as they are not indicative of interest in relevant content; we stopped including blogroll links in August 2008.
  • Authority is on a scale of 0-1000. 1000 is the highest possible authority.

Of course it is true that such statistics may be misleading: not all blogs will be registered; there may be technical difficulties in analysing the metrics; the metrics which determine the rankings do not appear to be well-documented; blogs will have a variety of purposes so simple rankings is likely to be inappropriate; etc. It also appears that these figures are quite volatile, with the numbers changing on a daily basis. Such volatility may be due to the constantly changing nature of the blogosphere, but cause also reflect problems with the Technorati service itself, which does not appear to be as reliable as it once was.

Despite such reservations, I feel that the ease of obtaining such statistics (once you have registered your ‘blog claim’ and allowed the data to be retrieved and analysed) means that Technorati provides a low-effort solution to the provision of blog metrics – and thus maximising the time which can be spent in doing productive work! And, of course, sometimes we may find that the Technorati metrics, which are based on the number of incoming links, may indeed have a positive correlation with the value of a blog – and since highly ranked blogs are likely to be more easily found in search engines (just as Google gives preference to highly linked-in Web pages generally) there can be advantages in seeking to enhance your Technorati ranking if maximising impact is one of your blog’s purposes.

Posted in Web 2.0 | Comments Off

BIC BSG met despite the snow

Posted by Brian Kelly on January 21st, 2010

On the 11th January the BIC Bibliographic Standards Group (of which I’m a member) met to consider the UK response to Papers scheduled for discussion at the MARBI meeting at the ALA 2010 Mid-Winter event. Following the meeting, the minutes were agreed via email, and posted on Google Docs on the 14th January.

Actually, when I say met, this was a telephone conference call – not a last-minute response to the weather and travel situation but pre-planned. The twice-yearly BIC BSG meetings take place just before the MARBI meetings, so that’s always early January and usually sometime in June. With group members based all over the UK, we now conference call the January meeting. Keeping the summer meeting face-to-face helps integrate new members but we are all more than happy not to have to face the challenges of winter travel.

The remit of the group is two-fold. One task is to decide on the UK response to proposed changes to the MARC 21 formats used in library catalogues; the UK representative presents this at the MARBI meetings. The other task is to keep a watching brief on a range of other standards of relevance to the UK library sector. Members of the group brief each other on a whole range of standards, often from the standpoint of a contributor to the development of a particular standard, or as a user of newly emerging standards. Where appropriate we can identify activity (e.g. an event, a paper) that we or another group might be able to take forward to inform the community.

So what were we discussing on the 11th January 2010? The five MARC 21 Proposals concerned differentiating types of electronic resources (2010-01), series data for digital preservation projects (2010-02), recording Date and Place of Capture information (2010-03) new data elements for work and expression information (2010-04) and coded cartographic mathematical data (2010-05). The three Discussion Papers concerned ISBD punctuation in records (2010-DP01), encoding URIs for controlled values (2010-DP02) and encoding new identifiers ISTC and ISNI (2010-DP03).

Standards we are currently watching are: BIC ‘Code of Practice for the Identification of E-Books and Digital Content’; the BIC E4Libraries Subject Category Headings (some public libraries are actively looking at using these); BIC Standard Subject Categories (pressure to converge with US scheme BISAC); International Standard Text Code (ISTC) – around 4,000 identifiers have been assigned to date; International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI) – voting on the draft closes in March; RDA-DCMI Initiative; RDA in RDF at the NSDL Registry (Element Sets and Vocabularies); Dublin Core; FRBR; FRAD; FRSAD; Bibliontology; MODS; MADS; METS; Learning Object Metadata (LOM); http://www.openarchives.org/ore/; Harmony (harmonisation of metadata models).

What about the practicalities of virtual meetings? We used a telephone conference call (offered by specialized service providers). If this is going to be a lengthy call I’d suggest using a handset with hands-free option or a headset – easier on the ear and to take notes. Alternatively you could try Skype, a software application to make voice calls over the Internet. Calls to other Skype users are free, but of course everyone needs to have the application installed. Skype also has additional features (e.g. instant messaging, file transfer and video conferencing) which may be useful.

Posted in Cataloguing, Libraries | Comments Off

Final Web 2 Workshop Dates

Posted by Marieke Guy on January 18th, 2010

This is your last chance to sign up for the free one-day workshop entitled ‘An Introduction to Web 2.0 and the Social Web’ sponsored by the MLA. The workshop be looking at what can Web 2.0 and the Social Web offer to museums, libraries and archives, especially small organisations with limited budgets and technical expertise.

The new dates are:

These dates are likely to fill up fast.

Posted in Events, mla-social-web-workshops | Comments Off

Papers Available From Culture Online 2009 Conference

Posted by Brian Kelly on January 18th, 2010

I received an announcement a few days ago informing me that the papers presented at the Culture Online 2009 Conference  are now available on the Culture Online 2009 Conference Web site.

There are quite a number of papers which are likely to be of interest, covering the conference themes of Digital library applications & interactive Web and Sustainable policies for digital culture preservation. In addition to these to these papers, the speakers slidesarealso available, together with the slides for invited presentations.

That’s the good news. The bad news is that these resources are only available on the conference Web site, and only in PDF format.  So that slides haven’t been uploaded to a slide-sharing service such as Slideshare or Authorstream which would enable the resources to be embedded elsewhere (such as in blog posts).  And since the original format for the slides (which was almost universally PowerPoint) is not available, it would be difficult for the slides to be reused.

To have the slides hosted on the conference Web site is sensible – for the slides for a conference which had a strong focus on Web 2.0 not to make use of a service such as Slideshare to enable this content to be more easily reused is, I feel, a mistake.

A blog was also used to support the conference – but despite the calls for speakers and delegates to make use of the blog, only six posts were published.  The blog was used, however, to provide access to abstracts of the papers and speaker details.

Posted in Events | Comments Off

Web 2.0 in the academic sector

Posted by Brian Kelly on January 12th, 2010

Since May 2009, Rosemary Russell and I have been working on a study for JISC, looking at the use of Web 2.0 tools and services by the academic sector. We chose to use a Web 2.0 tool – a blog – to collect our evidence and to make this public. People who responded to our invitation to contribute to the study did so by adding comments to topic Pages and we also interviewed a number of people in various roles about their experiences and wrote these up as case studies.

At the same time, Prof. Jane Hunter of the School of ITEE, University of Queensland was working on a parallel study of the situation in Australia. She used a different evidence-collecting strategy but came to very similar conclusions.

The evidence points to the current time being a transition point where early adopters are being joined by mainstream users. Nonetheless, there remains a proportion of users who are as yet Web 2.0 ‘illiterate’. The various Web 2.0 services are mostly seen as easy to sign up to and use, usually free to use and giving access to large audiences. The downside is that services may collapse trapping data, while institutions may block their use. It is common for users to prefer to use Web 2.0 services even when institutional alternatives are available.

What was also evident was that the situation in academic institutions is often not that different to the public sector. IT department blocking use of social networking services? Yes. Takes forever to get permission to set up a blog? Yes. Central management wanting control over all publicly visible text? Yes. Other staff feel threatened, even scared, of the technology or feel it will take time they don’t have? Yes.

But it was great to find out that there is genuine experimentation going on. Photography students using self-publishing sites as part of their studies. A Ning community set up for students before they officially start at University – and so before they can access institutional resources. A tutor using a wiki as a collaborative exam revision web site (Examopedia); this is used by the students to create and deposit answers to past exam papers collaboratively and is moderated by the tutor. An entirely volunteer-run library using Koha software for the catalogue and putting some of its stock on LibraryThing to publicise itself. Putting QR codes in library catalogues so mobile phones can be used to guide users to the shelves in a large collection or building or putting the QR codes on the ends of shelves to alert users to the fact that e-resources are also available.

Particularly interesting was the indication that attitudes of IT Departments are changing, as evidenced by the two case studies from IT staff. David Harrison (Assistant Director of Information Services at Cardiff University) uses a lot of different Web 2.0 services in his working life. He also noted that while the university went down the large implemetation route (i.e. keeping things in-house) a couple of years ago, if taking the decision now they would be looking closely at cloud computing and externally hosted services. Christine Saxton (Director of Corporate Information and Computing Services (CiCS) at the University of Sheffield) has a blog and uses Facebook and Twitter for work work and personal communication. She notes how her blog and Twitter enable her deaf father to keep in touch with her since phone calls aren’t an option. She also noted that CiCS has outsourced all student email to Google from Sept. 2009 and now just provides support to users.

The two reports were submitted to JISC in December 2009 and have been published in the
JISC Repository. The UK study is at http://ie-repository.jisc.ac.uk/438/ and the Australian study is at http://ie-repository.jisc.ac.uk/439/. As well as reading the reports, why not have a look at the blog and its topic Pages and case studies too for ideas and inspiration.

Tags: , ,
Posted in Web 2.0 | 1 Comment »

Google Wave and libraries: a snapshot

Posted by guestblogger on January 4th, 2010

d_jenkins_2On the 16th November last year David Jenkins, Assistant Librarian in the Electronic Resources Development Team at Manchester Metropolitan University, posted an email to the LIS-WEB2 mailing list asking about Google Wave usage among librarians. David has been kind enough to summarise his findings for us in a guest blog post.

David can be reached by email (d.jenkins@mmu.ac.uk), on Twitter @d_jenkins or on Wave (jenkins.david.r@googlewave.com).

*****************
The questions I asked the LIS-WEB2 mailing list were:

• If anybody else in the library world was using Google Wave?
• If so, what for and how?
• Do you have any library-related waves or Wave resources to recommend?

The opinions and information I was sent in response provided an interesting look at how Google Wave is being used by librarians and how it could be used by them in the future.

For an introduction to Wave itself see Google Wave: What’s all the Fuss About?. Readers can also refer to the Resources list at the end of this post for other recommended introductions to Wave and, if possible, actually use Wave themselves in order to become familiar with it.

One of the first things I got an insight into from the reaction to my questions was the popularity of Wave with librarians. I received over 20 responses in less than two days, which suggested a high level of interest in Wave. Indeed, as Google Wave accounts are available by invite only, a number of people were enquiring about invites to the service and a page was set up on the SINTO wiki to facilitate such requests. I was informed that there are numerous waves started by librarians and focusing upon library issues (please see the Library-related waves section of Resources below). Upon using Wave myself and reading around the topic, the impression I got is that the level of engagement with and interest in Wave amongst librarians appears to be proportionate to its popularity with the general public.

Google Wave

This enthusiasm for Wave was reflected in the behaviour of the existing library community that use the service. There seemed to be a general willingness amongst librarians to share Wave resources and knowledge. People were outgoing; adding me as a contact, inviting me to waves, putting me in touch with other Wave users and sending Wave invites to other librarians who requested them.

Google Wave

However, in spite of the apparent popularity of Wave, I received only two ideas regarding how Wave might be used in a library context. One respondent stated they had considered using Wave for collaborating with fellow members of an online study group. The group makes electronic and hard copy magazines, runs a blog and collaborates on various other creative projects and Wave offers them the ability to create and discuss their material online. Another respondent expressed a more general interest in the potential of Wave, putting forward the possibility of integrating Wave with Talis Prism 3 via the Juice Project. These ideas give something of a general impression of the variety of potential applications for Wave in libraries. The fact so few ideas were submitted is indicative of the fact the Wave is still at an early stage of its development and is only available to a limited (if rapidly growing) pool of users. It will take time and effort to establish what Wave is capable of and how those capabilities can best be exploited by libraries.

wave_3

Security concerns about Wave were raised and it seemed that a number of organisations’ ICT departments have reservations about the service. For example, Wave gadgets are applications that operate in Wave, allowing the embedding of code from non-trusted sources. As a result they are potentially vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) threats. Google’s own Yes/No/Maybe gadget triggers a clickjacking warning when using NoScript because the gadget contains partially hidden elements. While not necessarily an issue in itself when the gadget in question is provided by a trusted source it does highlight the fact that a non-trusted source could create a gadget with hidden elements in order to pose a clickjacking threat to Wave users. For a general overview of security issues in Wave see Social Hacking.

Two more respondents highlighted their worries regarding privacy in Wave. It was of concern that, if another user has your username, they can add you as a contact, whether you like it or not. Not only that but, once another user has added you as a contact, they can then add you to a wave, whether you like it or not too. This lack of control over your own account deterred these respondents from using Wave at all.

Google Wave

Access to Wave was an issue for public library workers. Respondents reported that many councils block Wave on staff computers, meaning many public librarians cannot access the program in order to figure out how it could be used in their environment.

Overall, whilst interest in Wave was high, there was a degree of scepticism regarding how useful it is to librarians. Tellingly, some respondents felt that there are not enough extensions for Wave to make it useful to librarians yet and that nobody has actually found a valuable practical use for Wave in libraries at this point. One respondent went as far as to state that Wave has yet to be used for anything beyond time wasting. On the whole, respondents seemed happy to let Wave develop and let other people find uses for it before they approach it with any seriousness.

I would like to extend my thanks to everybody on the LIS-WEB2 list who took the time to respond to my questions and to John Whalley (Senior Assistant Librarian – Manchester Metropolitan University) for information and advice regarding security in Google Wave .

Resources

Introductions

Invites

  • A page on the SINTO wiki for librarians who are looking for a Google Wave invitation. People who have invitations and are looking for recipients can check this page and send out invites:
    http://sinto.wetpaint.com/page/Google+Wave

Library-related public waves

N.B. You will need to be able to log into an active Google Wave account to view these waves.

Library-related bots

  • Milton (uncle-milty@appspot.com) – when you type a single word in a blip, Milton returns a list of titles from the John Hopkins University catalogue relating to that keyword
  • Fnordlinky (fnordlinks@appspot.com) – enter a PMID into a blip e.g. “PMID 12748199” and Fnordlinky replaces it with the citation information from PubMed
  • Library-y (library-y@appspot.com) – enter an ISBN into a blip e.g. 1606992864 and Library-y turns it into a link to the Library Thing entry for that title
  • Igor (helpmeigor@appspot.com) – reference management

Tags:
Posted in Guest-blog, Libraries | 4 Comments »