Comments by Users

There are 110 comments in this document
There are also issues of concern around attribution licenses and linked data. Attribution only works and thus has practical value at a dataset level. Given the composite nature of RDF, any single triple could be referenced or reused by another record or service. Attribution does not work practically in this context.
Seconded. Matching against identifiers takes time and is prone to error. Some recommendation over which ones to focus on would be great
Two JISC funded projects based around Cambridge, Open Bibliography and COMET have made large library related datasets available, but it only goes so far. I second Catherines' point about article / citation level data, there is serious value here. Furthermore, libraries could consider exposing operational data, holdings and anonymised circulation information to facilitate a richer range of interactive and recommendation based services.
This section makes some fairly high level assumptions about user understanding of HTTP. Such interactions with the data would depend largely upon the nature of the applications built around it.