Comments on: Relevant Technologies
http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/w3clld/2011/06/26/relevant-technologies/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=relevant-technologies
A blog to allow the community to comment on the draft report of the W3C linked library data incubator group.Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:35:20 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2By: Alan Danskin
http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/w3clld/2011/06/26/relevant-technologies/comment-page-1/#comment-111
Alan DanskinFri, 22 Jul 2011 15:58:02 +0000http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/w3clld/?p=31#comment-111This may be true, but it is also true that investment is needed in new skills, tools and kit.
]]>By: Jennifer Bowen
http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/w3clld/2011/06/26/relevant-technologies/comment-page-1/#comment-82
Jennifer BowenWed, 20 Jul 2011 20:07:43 +0000http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/w3clld/?p=31#comment-82Same comment as for paragraph 18 – this is a compelling point that should be brought out earlier in the report. Anything related to “lowering the barrier for entry” for libraries for linked data should be emphasized as much as possible.
]]>By: Jennifer Bowen
http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/w3clld/2011/06/26/relevant-technologies/comment-page-1/#comment-81
Jennifer BowenWed, 20 Jul 2011 20:05:56 +0000http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/w3clld/?p=31#comment-81A very important, and persuasive, point about generating RDF serializations on the fly, rather than “throwing away” current applications. I would suggest adding something general about this in the first section of the report, about Benefits of linked data. This is an important benefit, that libraries do not completely have to retool in order to implement linked data.
]]>