The Metadata Forum » Metadata Information http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/themetadataforum Metadata Matters... Wed, 09 Feb 2011 12:50:55 +0000 en-US hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2 Ploughing On & Joining In http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/themetadataforum/2010/12/09/ploughing-on-joining-in/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=ploughing-on-joining-in http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/themetadataforum/2010/12/09/ploughing-on-joining-in/#comments Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:03:33 +0000 Stephanie Taylor http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/themetadataforum/?p=184

*photo details at end of post

Just a quick update to confirm that despite recent adverse weather conditions, the Metadata Forum meeting on metadata for complex objects is still happening in York on Friday 10/December. There’s been a slight change to the original speaker lineup, but due to illness not snow. We’re tough up north!!

The speakers will be -

Nick Sheppard, Repository Developer, (sometimes Repository Czar), Leeds Metropolitan University

Nick will be talking about his experiences developing a “blended”repository for research and Open Educational Resources at Leeds Metropolitan University.

Julie Allinson, Digital Library Manager for the Library & Archives, University of York

Julie will be talking about the work of the Digital Library at the University of York, and in particular their work with images.

Jodie Double, Digital Content and Repositories Manager, University of Leeds

Jodie will be talking about user generated catalogue records for audio and video vs. the perfect record that is sometimes attempted to be achieved.

To find out more about the speakers and check the programme, see the Meeting Page.

This meeting is also now on Lanyrd, (with thanks to Nick Sheppard), so if you’re attending, go along and join the event page at – http://lanyrd.com/2010/metaforum/

This Forum meeting has been fully booked since Monday, but if you have questions or comments and are not able to attend, don’t forget to contact me and I’ll make sure your interest is represented at the meeting.

Contact me via -

Email – s.taylor@ukoln.ac.uk

Twitter – @metadataforum

Or leave a comment here on the blog.

There will be a live Twitter stream from the meeting tomorrow using the tag

#mdforum

Notes, speaker slides and other information will be available on Monday, so check back then.

*Photo from Autowitch via Flickr, used with thanks under CC license.
]]>
http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/themetadataforum/2010/12/09/ploughing-on-joining-in/feed/ 0
A Voyage Round Dublin Core http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/themetadataforum/2010/12/03/a-voyage-round-dublin-core/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=a-voyage-round-dublin-core http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/themetadataforum/2010/12/03/a-voyage-round-dublin-core/#comments Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:31:58 +0000 Stephanie Taylor http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/themetadataforum/?p=145 *Image details at end of post

A long time ago in a faraway place, ‘DC’ was associated in my mind with the word ‘Washington’. Aged 7, I was very proud to be the only kid in my class who knew that ‘DC’ in ‘Washington DC’ stood for ‘District of Columbia’ I wasn’t particularly bright, but my aunty had a friend who had moved there, so it stuck in my head. I had no idea what it actually meant,  I’d just  rote-learned the words.

Time moves on, and as anyone who has tangled with metadata at an level can tell you, these days ‘DC’ has only one meaning for me – Dublin Core. When first exposed to DC,  I often had  that same feeling I’d had, aged 7,  of parroting things I had heard or read. Phrases and acronyms zipped around in my head, (simple, qualified, DCMI, Core (why core?!?), Dublin (and was there any Guinness?) ISO Standard 15836, NISO Standard Z39.85-2007, and on and on) accompanied by a vague feeling of panic and I longed for the certainty I’d had in my life when ‘DC’ meant ‘District of Columbia’.

Then one day I’d had enough. I decided I was going to try and find out what this DC stuff was all about. I started with some basic facts, working on the principle that the more you know, the less there is to fear. Tackling the ‘Dublin’ and ‘Core’ bit, I found nothing too scary. ‘Dublin’ was because the first workshop where DC was discussed was held in Dublin, Ohio, USA. Images of metadata being discussed over pints of Guinness along the Liffey vanished at once.  ‘Core’ was even more illuminating. The concept of a ‘core’  metadata elements set that can be expended is at the heart of DC. Of course, this led to a realisation that Simple DC was a basic, pared-down set of 15 elements and Qualified DC was about expanding that core element set and making it more flexible. Simple! Well, maybe, maybe not, but that’s a story yet to be told…

And it’s because of that story that I’m revisiting my early experiences with DC.  Over the next few weeks I’m going to be re-looking at DC and the work of the DCMI from a practical perspective. I want to see what’s happening on the ground with DC, how people are using it or not using it, what works and what doesn’t. When the Metadata Forum launched, I asked people to bring me their ‘metadata hopes, dreams and fears’, and DC seems to fit into all three categories. If you love DC, loath it or are just plain baffled, let me know and I’ll incorporate your questions and experiences into the DC posts, and I’m also working on a Forum meeting focussed on DC.

So wish me ‘Bon Voyage’ and watch out here on the blog for postcards along the way…

*Image from calsidyrose via Flickr, used under CC license.

]]>
http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/themetadataforum/2010/12/03/a-voyage-round-dublin-core/feed/ 0