Comments on: Silos of the LAMS: A UKOLN Perspective http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/cultural-heritage/2009/09/15/silos-of-the-lams-a-ukoln-perspective/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=silos-of-the-lams-a-ukoln-perspective A UKOLN Blog for the Cultural Heritage sector (now archived) Tue, 05 Apr 2011 10:20:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2 By: Cultural Heritage » Blog Archive » 100 And Counting http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/cultural-heritage/2009/09/15/silos-of-the-lams-a-ukoln-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-11504 Cultural Heritage » Blog Archive » 100 And Counting Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:45:58 +0000 http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/cultural-heritage/?p=647#comment-11504 [...] Blog posts have also provided an opportunity to report on talks given at a range of events throughout the country including the AIM 2009 conference, the CILIP-S and CILIP Wales conferences, the “Archives 2.0: Shifting Dialogues between Users and Archivists” conference, the MCG Spring Meeting and the Silos of the LAMS CILIP Executive briefing. [...]

]]>
By: Andy Powell http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/cultural-heritage/2009/09/15/silos-of-the-lams-a-ukoln-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-3475 Andy Powell Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:03:27 +0000 http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/cultural-heritage/?p=647#comment-3475 RSS was part of the “mandated use of certain standards and best practices” since the very early days of its adoption – so the fact it wasn’t widely adopted (enough) is probably down to something else.

I’d also argue that there has always been a spirit of sharing and collaboration – indeed one might argue that this was much stronger in the days of eLib than it is currently.

Openness is an interesting issue. I think libraries have traditionally been open with their catalogues in the sense that they would let you search them (if you adopted the right standard) but not in the sense that they’d give you a copy of all the records. Likewise, museums have been luke warm in their willingness to open their digital content up to the wider world. I wonder if these attitudes have really changed much over the years?

So I think any positive movement has to come from a distinct change in attitude towards the value of open content – and that this has to come from the top down and be reflected in the ways institutions are measured. I don’t think that ‘sharing and collaboration’ are (or have ever been) an issue.

?

]]>